Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

• HRR Strafrecht

  Art. 1 EMRK; Art. 8 EMRK; Art. 10 EMRK
  Recht auf Achtung des Privatlebens / der Korrespondenz (Telefonüberwachung; Verwertung / Veröffentlichung von Ergebnissen der Telefonüberwachung; Verhältnismäßigkeit; Notwendigkeit in einer demokratischen Gesellschaft; Gesetzesvorbehalt; legitimes Ziel; negative und ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  CRAXI v. ITALY (No. 2)

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 14, Art. 18, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 8 with regard to release of transcripts into the public domain Violation of Art. 8 with regard to reading out of transcripts at trial Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award (englisch)

• Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte

  (englisch)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Verfahrensgang

• EKMR, 14.10.1996 - 25337/94
• EGMR, 07.12.2000 - 25337/94
• EGMR, 17.07.2003 - 25337/94
• EGMR, 04.10.2017 - 25337/94

Wird zitiert von ... (5)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 24.04.1990 - 11801/85

  KRUSLIN c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.07.2003 - 25337/94

  The Court points out that telephone conversations are covered by the notions of "private life" and "correspondence" within the meaning of Article 8 (see, among other authorities, the following judgments: Malone v. the United Kingdom of 2 August 1984, Series A no. 82, p. 30, § 64; Kruslin v. France and Huvig v. France of 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176-A and B, p. 20, § 26, and p. 52, § 25; Halford v. the United Kingdom of 25 June 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-III, pp. 1016-17, § 48; Kopp v. Switzerland of 25 March 1998, Reports 1998-II, p. 540, § 53).

  Even if it is primarily for the national authorities, notably the courts, to interpret and apply the relevant internal rules (see Kruslin v. France , judgment of 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176-A, pp. 21-22, § 29, and Amann v. Switzerland (GC), no. 27798/95, § 52, ECHR 2000-II), the Court can and should exercise a certain power to review whether domestic law has been complied with.

• EGMR, 23.09.1994 - 15890/89

  JERSILD v. DENMARK

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.07.2003 - 25337/94

  The Court recalls that freedom of expression constitutes one of the essential foundations of a democratic society and that the safeguards to be afforded to the press are of particular importance (see, among other authorities, Jersild v. Danemark , judgment of 23 September 1994, Series A no. 298, p. 23, § 31).
• EGMR, 02.08.1984 - 8691/79

  MALONE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.07.2003 - 25337/94

  The Court points out that telephone conversations are covered by the notions of "private life" and "correspondence" within the meaning of Article 8 (see, among other authorities, the following judgments: Malone v. the United Kingdom of 2 August 1984, Series A no. 82, p. 30, § 64; Kruslin v. France and Huvig v. France of 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176-A and B, p. 20, § 26, and p. 52, § 25; Halford v. the United Kingdom of 25 June 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-III, pp. 1016-17, § 48; Kopp v. Switzerland of 25 March 1998, Reports 1998-II, p. 540, § 53).

• EGMR, 16.04.2013 - 22018/10

  CASUNEANU v. ROMANIA

  The Government submitted that society's right to information on the behaviour and activities of public figures prevailed over the right of those persons to the protection of their public image, and pointed out that the material in question concerned exclusively the criminal charges against the applicant and not his private life (they referred, a contrario, to Craxi v. Italy (no. 2), no. 25337/94, 17 July 2003).

  In particular, it reiterates that by virtue of the positive obligations inherent in effective respect for private life, the Court must examine whether the national authorities took the necessary steps to ensure effective protection of that right (Craxi v. Italy (no. 2), no. 25337/94, § 73, 17 July 2003).

• EGMR, 03.02.2015 - 22765/12

  Leaks aus Ermittlungsakten können gegen Menschenrechtskonvention verstoßen

  In particular, it reiterates that by virtue of the positive obligations inherent in effective respect for private life, the Court must examine whether the national authorities took the necessary steps to ensure effective protection of that right (see Craxi v. Italy (no. 2), no. 25337/94, § 73, 17 July 2003).
• EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 36966/04

  BOYACI c. TURQUIE

  En plus, il échet de noter que les juridictions appelées à connaître de l'affaire étaient entièrement composées de juges professionnels qui disposent normalement d'une expérience et d'une formation leur permettant d'écarter toute suggestion extérieure au procès (Craxi c. Italie (no 2), no 25337/94, § 104, 17 juillet 2003, Mircea, précité, § 75, et Begu, précité, § 130).
• EGMR, 30.04.2013 - 14064/07

  CARIELLO ET AUTRES c. ITALIE

  En effet, ces griefs ne portent pas sur la responsabilité de la presse quant à la publication des écoutes litigieuses, mais sur l'omission, par l'Etat, de protéger de manière effective le droit des requérants au respect de leur vie privée et de leur correspondance, en prévoyant des garanties pour empêcher la divulgation du contenu des écoutes et en menant une enquête effective pour identifier et punir les responsables de la divulgation (voir, notamment, Craxi c. Italie (no 2), no 25337/94, §§ 73-74, 17 juillet 2003).
• EGMR, 17.11.2015 - 60369/11

  DAS UNIVERSELLE LEBEN ALLER KULTUREN WELTWEIT E.V. v. GERMANY

  Darüber hinaus berücksichtigt der Gerichtshof, dass eine Person das Recht auf Schutz ihrer persönlichen Daten hat, wenn diese von öffentlichen Institutionen gespeichert werden (siehe, sinngemäß, Craxi./. Italien, (Nr. 2), Individualbeschwerde Nr. 25337/94, Rdnrn. 70, 76, 17. Juli 2003).