Rechtsprechung
| EGMR - 50301/22 |
Anhängiges Verfahren
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
BLASKO v. SLOVAKIA
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 16.02.2021 - 1128/17
Meng ./. Deutschland - Konventionsverletzung durch Beteiligung eines nicht …
Auszug aus EGMR - 50301/22
In the determination of the criminal charges against him, did the applicant have a hearing by an impartial tribunal, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, for example, Perus v. Slovenia, no. 35016/05, § 38, 27 September 2012; Meng v. Germany, no. 1128/17, §§ 42-52 and 54-63, 16 February 2021; and Mucha v. Slovakia, no. 63703/19, §§ 50-68, 25 November 2021)?. - EGMR, 27.02.2014 - 17103/10
Verletzung des Grundsatzes der Unschuldsvermutung gegenüber einem türkischen …
Auszug aus EGMR - 50301/22
In particular, in the judgment concerning B, did the court make it sufficiently clear that it was not also implicitly determining the applicant's guilt, so as to avoid, as far as possible, giving the impression that it was prejudging it (see, for example, Karaman v. Germany, no. 17103/10, §§ 63, 64, 67 and 70, 27 February 2014, and Bauras v. Lithuania, no. 56795/13, § 54, 31 October 2017)?. - EGMR, 25.11.2021 - 63703/19
MUCHA v. SLOVAKIA
Auszug aus EGMR - 50301/22
In the determination of the criminal charges against him, did the applicant have a hearing by an impartial tribunal, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, for example, Perus v. Slovenia, no. 35016/05, § 38, 27 September 2012; Meng v. Germany, no. 1128/17, §§ 42-52 and 54-63, 16 February 2021; and Mucha v. Slovakia, no. 63703/19, §§ 50-68, 25 November 2021)?. - EGMR, 31.10.2017 - 56795/13
BAURAS v. LITHUANIA
Auszug aus EGMR - 50301/22
In particular, in the judgment concerning B, did the court make it sufficiently clear that it was not also implicitly determining the applicant's guilt, so as to avoid, as far as possible, giving the impression that it was prejudging it (see, for example, Karaman v. Germany, no. 17103/10, §§ 63, 64, 67 and 70, 27 February 2014, and Bauras v. Lithuania, no. 56795/13, § 54, 31 October 2017)?.