Rechtsprechung
   EKMR, 04.03.1998 - 36283/97   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/1998,21196
EKMR, 04.03.1998 - 36283/97 (https://dejure.org/1998,21196)
EKMR, Entscheidung vom 04.03.1998 - 36283/97 (https://dejure.org/1998,21196)
EKMR, Entscheidung vom 04. März 1998 - 36283/97 (https://dejure.org/1998,21196)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1998,21196) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

  • BGH, 15.04.1980 - VI ZR 76/79

    Eingriff in das Persönlichkeitsrecht durch Presseberichterstattung; Betroffenheit

    Auszug aus EKMR, 04.03.1998 - 36283/97
    These could however only demand an injunction against certain statements to the extent that these statements - at least also - directly affect their strictly personal legal position (cf. BGH NJW 1980, 1790; BVerwG DÖV 1984, 940 concerning the appeal against the prohibition of an association).

    The criminal law protection of the honour and the civil law protection of the personality have been limited with regard to persons who might be defamed as an indirect result of a statement directed at someone else, in order not to destroy the system rights regarding the protection of personal integrity (BGH NJW 1980, 1790).

  • VGH Bayern, 28.03.1994 - 7 CE 93.2403
    Auszug aus EKMR, 04.03.1998 - 36283/97
    If a pejorative statement is made about a group, then a member of the group can only seek a remedy against this in his own name, when the statement involves a criterion which is manifestly applicable to all the members of the group (cf. BayObLG NJW 1990, 1724; BayVGH NVwZ 1994, 787; BayVBl 1995, 564).
  • VGH Bayern, 14.04.1994 - 7 CE 93.3071
    Auszug aus EKMR, 04.03.1998 - 36283/97
    If a pejorative statement is made about a group, then a member of the group can only seek a remedy against this in his own name, when the statement involves a criterion which is manifestly applicable to all the members of the group (cf. BayObLG NJW 1990, 1724; BayVGH NVwZ 1994, 787; BayVBl 1995, 564).
  • BVerfG, 10.10.1995 - 1 BvR 1476/91

    "Soldaten sind Mörder"

    Auszug aus EKMR, 04.03.1998 - 36283/97
    On the imaginary scale, at one end of which stands the individual defamation of a named or identifiable single person, one can find at the other end the negative value-judgmental statement about human characteristics in general, or criticism of social bodies or matters, which are no longer capable of affecting the honour of the individual (cf. BVerfG NJW 1995, 3303/3306).
  • EGMR, 06.09.1978 - 5029/71

    Klass u.a. ./. Deutschland

    Auszug aus EKMR, 04.03.1998 - 36283/97
    Referring to the cases of Klass and Malone (Eur Court HR, Klass and others v. Germany judgment of 6 September 1978, Series A no. 28; Malone v. United Kingdom judgment of 2 August 1984, Series A no. 82), they consider themselves to be directly affected by the campaign directly targeted at a specific minority community, in the course of which the members of that community were described as either brain-dead zombies or demonic manipulators of enslaved victims.
  • EGMR, 02.08.1984 - 8691/79

    MALONE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EKMR, 04.03.1998 - 36283/97
    Referring to the cases of Klass and Malone (Eur Court HR, Klass and others v. Germany judgment of 6 September 1978, Series A no. 28; Malone v. United Kingdom judgment of 2 August 1984, Series A no. 82), they consider themselves to be directly affected by the campaign directly targeted at a specific minority community, in the course of which the members of that community were described as either brain-dead zombies or demonic manipulators of enslaved victims.
  • EGMR, 07.12.1976 - 5095/71

    KJELDSEN, BUSK MADSEN AND PEDERSEN v. DENMARK

    Auszug aus EKMR, 04.03.1998 - 36283/97
    Furthermore, there is no indication in the case file that the first and second applicant's children have ever been confronted in the schoolteaching they received with the contested article or that they risk being subjected to indoctrination that might be considered as not respecting parents' religious and philosophical convictions (see Eur. Court HR, Kjeldsen, Busk Madsen and Pedersen v. Denmark judgment of 7 December 1976, Series A no. 23, p. 26, para. 53).
  • BGH, 09.02.1982 - VI ZR 123/80

    Beurteilung des Aussagegehalts einer inkriminierten Äußerung - Abwägung zwischen

    Auszug aus EKMR, 04.03.1998 - 36283/97
    Someone who wants to make a negative statement about a group, is however in principle also responsible for avoidable effects of his statements on the honour of a person who, while not as such intended to be the target of the attack, nonetheless comes in the way of the attack (cf. BGH NJW 1982, 1805).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht