Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 76639/11   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2018,30024
EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 76639/11 (https://dejure.org/2018,30024)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 25.09.2018 - 76639/11 (https://dejure.org/2018,30024)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 25. September 2018 - 76639/11 (https://dejure.org/2018,30024)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2018,30024) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (4)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    DENISOV v. UKRAINE

    Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal;Independent tribunal);Non-pecuniary damage - award ...

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    DENISOV c. UKRAINE

    Partiellement irrecevable (Art. 35) Conditions de recevabilité;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation de l'article 6 - Droit à un procès équitable (Article 6 - Procédure administrative;Article 6-1 - Tribunal impartial;Tribunal indépendant);Préjudice moral - ...

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    DENISOV v. UKRAINE - [Deutsche Übersetzung] Zusammenfassung durch das Österreichische Institut für Menschenrechte (ÖIM)

    [DEU] Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal;Independent tribunal);Non-pecuniary damage - award ...

  • juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (154)Neu Zitiert selbst (29)

  • EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 54810/00

    Einsatz von Brechmitteln; Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Schutzbereich; faires …

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 76639/11
    The Court has also consistently applied a threshold of severity in cases concerning Article 3 of the Convention (see, for example, Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, § 67, ECHR 2006-IX; Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 88, ECHR 2010; and Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no. 23380/09, § 86, ECHR 2015).
  • EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30562/04

    S. und Marper ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 76639/11
    Article 8 protects in addition a right to personal development, and the right to establish and develop relationships with other human beings and the outside world (see S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, § 66, ECHR 2008; Gillberg, cited above, § 66; and Barbulescu v. Romania [GC], no. 61496/08, § 70, ECHR 2017 (extracts), with further references therein).
  • EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13710/88

    NIEMIETZ v. GERMANY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 76639/11
    It is, after all, in the course of their working lives that the majority of people have a significant opportunity to develop relationships with the outside world (see Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, § 29, Series A no. 251-B; Oleksandr Volkov, cited above, § 165; and Barbulescu, cited above, § 71).
     
  • EGMR, 23.09.2010 - 425/03

    Obst gegen Deutschland

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 76639/11
    Other types of cases have concerned restrictions on access to employment in the public service (see Naidin v. Romania, no. 38162/07, 21 October 2014), loss of employment outside the public service (see Obst v. Germany, no. 425/03, 23 September 2010; Schüth v. Germany, no. 1620/03, ECHR 2010; Fernández Martínez, cited above; ?žahin Ku?Ÿ, cited above; and Barbulescu, cited above), and restrictions on access to a profession in the private sector (see Sidabras and D?¾iautas, cited above; Campagnano, cited above; and Bigaeva, cited above).
  • EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08

    CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 76639/11
    It follows that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the admissibility and merits of the remaining complaints (see, among other authorities, Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064/90 and 8 others, §§ 210-11, ECHR 2009, and Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014, with further references).
  • EGMR, 11.01.2007 - 73049/01

    Budweiser-Streit

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 76639/11
    v. Portugal [GC], no. 73049/01, § 64, ECHR 2007-I).
  • EGMR, 09.06.2005 - 55723/00

    FADEÏEVA c. RUSSIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 76639/11
    The Court has ruled that the assessment of this minimum level in such cases is relative and depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the intensity and duration of the nuisance and its physical or mental effects on the individual's health or quality of life (see Fadeyeva v. Russia, no. 55723/00, §§ 68 and 69, ECHR 2005-IV; Dubetska and Others v. Ukraine, no. 30499/03, § 105, 10 February 2011; and Grimkovskaya v. Ukraine, no. 38182/03, § 58, 21 July 2011).
  • EGMR, 09.04.2009 - 28070/06

    A. v. NORWAY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 76639/11
    In addition, the Court has ruled that an attack on a person's reputation must attain a certain level of seriousness and be made in a manner causing prejudice to personal enjoyment of the right to respect for private life (see A. v. Norway, no. 28070/06, §§ 63-64, 9 April 2009; Polanco Torres and Movilla Polanco v. Spain, no. 34147/06, §§ 40 and 44, 21 September 2010; Axel Springer AG, cited above, § 83; Delfi AS v. Estonia [GC], no. 64569/09, § 137, ECHR 2015; and Bédat v. Switzerland [GC], no. 56925/08, § 72, ECHR 2016).
  • EGMR, 10.02.1983 - 7299/75

    ALBERT ET LE COMPTE c. BELGIQUE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 76639/11
    According to the Court's case-law, even where an adjudicatory body determining disputes over "civil rights and obligations" does not comply with Article 6 § 1 in some respect, no violation of the Convention can be found if the proceedings before that body are "subject to subsequent control by a judicial body that has full jurisdiction and does provide the guarantees of Article 6 § 1" (see Albert and Le Compte v. Belgium, 10 February 1983, § 29, Series A no. 58, and Tsfayo v. the United Kingdom, no. 60860/00, § 42, 14 November 2006).
  • EGMR, 06.03.2012 - 23563/07

    GAGLIANO GIORGI c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 76639/11
    Notably, it has done so when assessing the "significant disadvantage" under Article 35 § 3 (b) of the Convention as an explicit admissibility requirement for the whole system of the Convention rights (see, for example, Giusti v. Italy, no. 13175/03, § 34, 18 October 2011; Gagliano Giorgi v. Italy, no. 23563/07, § 56, ECHR 2012 (extracts); and El Kaada v. Germany, no. 2130/10, § 41, 12 November 2015).
  • EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 34147/06

    POLANCO TORRES ET MOVILLA POLANCO c. ESPAGNE

  • EGMR, 12.04.2006 - 58675/00

    MARTINIE c. FRANCE

  • EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30566/04
  • EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 30499/03

    DUBETSKA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

  • EGMR, 16.12.2003 - 48843/99

    COOPER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  • EGMR, 27.07.2004 - 59330/00
  • EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 13175/03

    GIUSTI c. ITALIE

  • EGMR, 21.10.2014 - 38162/07

    NAIDIN c. ROUMANIE

  • EGMR, 24.04.2014 - 27310/09

    UDOVICIC v. CROATIA

  • EGMR, 23.03.2006 - 77955/01

    CAMPAGNANO v. ITALY

  • EGMR, 02.02.2016 - 18650/05

    SODAN c. TURQUIE

  • EGMR, 01.07.2008 - 71146/01

    BORYSIEWICZ v. POLAND

  • EGMR, 23.06.1981 - 6878/75

    LE COMPTE, VAN LEUVEN ET DE MEYERE c. BELGIQUE

  • EGMR, 23.02.2017 - 43395/09

    DE TOMMASO v. ITALY

  • EGMR, 19.04.2007 - 63235/00

    VILHO ESKELINEN AND OTHERS v. FINLAND

  • EGMR, 19.10.2005 - 32555/96

    ROCHE c. ROYAUME-UNI

  • EGMR, 05.02.2015 - 22251/08

    BOCHAN v. UKRAINE (No. 2)

  • EGMR - 34179/08 (anhängig)

    [ENG]

  • EGMR, 26.07.2012 - 38773/05

    SAVITSKYY v. UKRAINE

  • EGMR, 16.02.2021 - 1128/17

    Meng ./. Deutschland - Konventionsverletzung durch Beteiligung eines nicht …

    44.  Unter Unparteilichkeit ist das Nichtvorliegen von Voreingenommenheit oder Befangenheit zu verstehen (siehe u.a. Denisov ./. Ukraine (GK), Individualbeschwerde Nr. 76639/11, Rdnr. 61, 25. September 2018, und Alexandru Marian Iancu ./. Rumänien, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 60858/15, Rdnr. 57, 4. Februar 2020).
  • EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 215/19

    Diskriminierung: Deutschland hat Racial-Profiling-Vorwurf nicht genug geprüft

    23. In certain contexts, the Court has considered it necessary to specifically examine whether the effects of the act in question attained a threshold of severity ­ that is, had serious negative effects on the individual's private life ­ in order for Article 8 to be applicable (see, in particular, Denisov v. Ukraine [GC], no. 76639/11, §§ 110-13, 25 September 2018).
  • EGMR, 07.05.2021 - 4907/18

    XERO FLOR w POLSCE sp. z o. o. - Unabhängigkeit der polnischen Gerichte

    The dispute must be genuine and serious; it may relate not only to the actual existence of a right, but also to its scope and the manner of its exercise; and, finally, the result of the proceedings must be directly decisive for the right in question, mere tenuous connections or remote consequences not being sufficient to bring Article 6 § 1 into play (see, among many other authorities, Athanassoglou and Others v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27644/95, § 43, ECHR 2000-IV; Károly Nagy v. Hungary [GC], no. 56665/09, § 60, 14 September 2017; and Denisov v. Ukraine [GC], no. 76639/11, § 44, 25 September 2018, with further references).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht